Lucid USA, Inc. (Lucid) is recalling certain 2025-2026 Gravity vehicles. The lap belt anchor brackets on the second row seats may have insufficient welds, which can cause bracket failure. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal...
2025-2027 · 3 model years
Lucid Gravity Problems by year
Owners have filed 18 complaints about the Lucid Gravity across 3 model years, and it has 3 recalls. The 2026 has the most complaints once its age is allowed for (17), while 2027 has far fewer than a typical year. The most reported problem area is the driver assistance, followed by the visibility & wipers.
- Complaints
- 18
- Recalls
- 3
- Crashes
- 0
- Fires
- 0
- Injuries
- 1
- Deaths
- 0
Gravity complaints by model year
Highlighted: the year with the most complaints for its age. Older vehicles have had more time to collect complaints - the Safety Index grade allows for that.
Most common Gravity problems
Lucid Gravity recalls 3
Lucid USA, Inc. (Lucid) is recalling certain 2025-2026 Gravity vehicles operating a software version prior to 3.3.20. The rearview camera image may not display when the vehicle is placed in reverse. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements...
Lucid USA, Inc. (Lucid) is recalling certain 2026 Gravity vehicles. Incorrect backrest covers may have been installed on the front seats, preventing the side air bags from deploying correctly.
Latest Gravity complaints
Starting from day one of the ownership, the vehicle developed a persistent high-frequency electrical noise originating around dashboard and front seats. This noise causes headaches in my husband and I after approximately ten minutes of driving, which substantially impairs the vehicle's use, value, and safety. Also regenerative brakes perform with inconsistent forth, between low/standard/high regeneration breaking. This causes unexpected loss of breaking by one pedal, where sometimes mechanical breaks need and sometimes need not to be applied, which is substantial safety issue.
Multiple times while driving on the highway while using the "hands free driving", the car didn't seem to recognize traffic slowing down ahead and then started flashing in red "break now!" I had to slam on the breaks to avoid rear ending the car in front of me. The car video recording system recorded the incidents.
The windshield washer system on vehicle became inoperable at the beginning of July. This condition has occurred for nearly 4 months now, and despite numerous, repeated attempts, Lucid Motors won't take the vehicle in for service. A mobile technician did inspect the vehicle on 9/4/26 and told me he was unable to fix issue and that it needs to brought in for service. The Lucid Motors service department refuses to schedule the repair. Further, I was informed that they are "undermanned" and told that their Service...
Read the full complaint
Center voicemail system that I had been calling "has never worked, and not to call it and leave messages". Calls to Lucid Motors "Customer Care" department have resulted in repeated promises, but no actions on the part of Lucid Motors. Operable windshield washing systems are required under Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 571.104. Lucid Motors failure to address this issue puts my safety at risk and potentially the safety of the vehicles around me if my lack of visibility results in a collision. Further, my vehicle's emergency braking and collision avoidance systems rely on cameras at the top of the windshield. My inability to clean my windshield has resulted in numerous "blocked sensor" and "system unavailable" warnings because these systems cannot adequately "see" through a dirty windshield.
The problems with this vehicle placed my wife and me in several life-threatening situations for an extended period. The most serious event happened on [[redacted]] during Labor Day weekend traffic. The vehicle suddenly and severely lost propulsion at highway speed, and [[redacted]] has not identified or documented the cause of that failure. Because the cause remains unknown, I have no reasonable basis to believe the vehicle is safe to drive or that the same event will not happen again. Four serious dangers during...
Read the full complaint
the [[redacted]] incident 1. Sudden loss of speed in highway traffic. While traveling in traffic moving at more than 70 mph, the Gravity suddenly and severely lost propulsion and slowed to less than about 10 mph. This created an immediate danger of being struck from behind by vehicles and large trucks traveling at highway speed. 2. Immediate need to cross traffic and get off the roadway. Because the vehicle could no longer keep up with traffic, I had to immediately navigate it through fast-moving Labor Day weekend traffic toward the side of the road. The vehicle had very little available speed, which greatly reduced my ability to avoid other vehicles or respond to changing traffic conditions. 3. Stranded beside an on-ramp for about 30 minutes. After reaching the side of the road, we remained in an extremely dangerous location for about half an hour. Large trucks passed very close to us while accelerating to enter the interstate. A Maryland State Trooper eventually arrived. He was adamant that the location was extremely unsafe, even after he parked his patrol vehicle behind us with its emergency lights flashing. 4. Forced to drive at about 10 mph with the frunk hood fully open. To reach a safer location, I had to travel along [redacted] for about 20 minutes to the next exit. Each time I put the vehicle into gear, the frunk hood fully opened on its own. I could close the hood from inside the vehicle, but it opened again every time I put the vehicle into gear. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
On [redacted] while driving approximately 170 miles along the [[redacted]] corridor from [[redacted]] to [[redacted]], the vehicle's Hands-Free driver assistance system (Highway Assist / DreamDrive) suffered three critical, unprovoked disengagements, creating severe near-miss rear-end hazards. Prior to the trip, I had intentionally disabled the automatic lane change feature due to known unreliability, relying only on Hands-Free lane centering and speed control while performing manual lane changes myself. Despite...
Read the full complaint
this, the system failed catastrophically three times: Incident 1 (Heavy Rain): Driving in torrential rain where the windshield wipers failed to adequately clear the glass. With no vehicles ahead but traffic actively following behind, the Hands-Free system abruptly disengaged and caused immediate unexpected deceleration. In extremely poor visibility on a high-speed interstate, this sudden slowdown created an immediate rear-end collision hazard. Incident 2 (Passing Lane Maneuver): While driving around 70-75 mph in a 65 mph zone to complete a standard overtaking maneuver in the passing lane, the system suddenly dumped steering and speed control mid-maneuver with traffic fast approaching from behind. I had to instantly intervene to prevent a collision and keep control of the vehicle. Incident 3 (Unprovoked Disengagement): On an open, straight highway segment with clear weather, no road construction, no lane obstruction, and no surrounding vehicles, the system abruptly disengaged for no identifiable reason. A driver-assist system in a 3-row family vehicle that unpredictably disengages in adverse weather, mid-overtake, and on clear open highways poses an unreasonable risk of severe rear-end crashes. This constitutes a critical safety defect that requires immediate federal investigation. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
I had three children in the vehicle getting out. Two in the second row and one in the third row. I walked away from the car with the key in my pocket and my two children in the second row closed the door on the child in the third row before she got out. Because my key was in my pocket and i was far away from the vehicle, the car locked when the doors shut. My child in the third row climbed into the second row and attempted to open the door--she could not open any of the rear doors. The child locks were not...
Read the full complaint
activated, and there is no way to open the rear doors when the car is locked. I tried this with my older child, thinking my younger child was not strong enough to manually open the doors when they were locked and the key was away, and she could not do it either. There is no way for a child to get out of the car if they accidentally close the doors on themselves, the key is not nearby, and the car locks. This is an EXTREME SAFETY HAZARD. This Lucid has many electrical glitches, but this is the first one that i have come across that now makes me nervous to own the car. Having child locks activated is a different story, but if those are turned off, anyone should be able to exit the vehicle when it is on or off if they are locked in the car. Children can become trapped and when this happens there can be severe consequences, especially in the summer time.
Questions about the Lucid Gravity
Which Lucid Gravity years have the most problems?
What are the most common Lucid Gravity problems?
Across every model year, owners report problems with the driver assistance (8), visibility & wipers (4), electrical system (3) most often.
How many recalls does the Lucid Gravity have?
NHTSA lists 3 recalls across all Lucid Gravity model years. Each year's page lists the recalls for that year; check your own vehicle by VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls to see whether the repair has been done.
Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls, checked daily. Complaints are owners' own reports and are not verified. How we use the data