Check a vehicle VIN check Latest recalls Latest complaints Common problems Rankings Compare vehicles Recall roundups All makes Guides Share your experience
Theme

1997-2027 · 31 model years

Forest River Salem Problems by year

Owners have filed 9 complaints about the Forest River Salem across 31 model years, and it has 64 recalls. The 2011 has the most complaints once its age is allowed for (2), while 2001, 2002 have far fewer than a typical year. The most reported problem area is the suspension, followed by the wheels & tires.

Most complaints for its age20112 complaints · 3 recallsSee the 2011
Complaints
9
Recalls
64
Crashes
0
Fires
1
Injuries
0
Deaths
0

Salem complaints by model year

Highlighted: the year with the most complaints for its age. Older vehicles have had more time to collect complaints - the Safety Index grade allows for that.

YearComplaintsRecallsCrashesFiresTop problemGrade
20270200-F
20260600-F
20250800-F
202401000-F
20230500-F
20220700-F
202101000-F
20200700-F
201901100-F
20180900-F
20170900-F
20160800-D
20150500-C
20140400-C
20130200-B
20120100-A
20112301Body, doors & structureC
20101200Body, doors & structureB
20090100-A
20083300SuspensionC
20070200-B
20060200-B
20050200-B
20040300-B
20030300-B
20021100Electrical systemA
20012100Equipment & accessoriesA
20000100-A
19990100-A
19980100-A
19970100-A

Most common Salem problems

Forest River Salem recalls 64

Electrical system: wiring

25V68200020,305 vehicles affected

Forest River, Inc. (Forest River) is recalling certain 2025-2026 Forest River Aurora, Coachmen Catalina, 2026 Coachmen Viking, Coachmen Clipper, 2016-2026 Wildwood, and Salem recreational trailers. The distribution panel wire may be connected to the battery...

Latest Salem complaints

2002 Forest River SalemElectrical system

Tl* the contact owns a 2002 forest river salem. The contact stated he experienced a loss of electrical power on the passenger side of the rv. The rv was not diagnosed nor repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The contact referenced nhtsa campaign number: 98e028000 (electrical system). The contact was notified by the manufacturer that once magnetek was purchased by their company, they no longer had any responsibility to perform the recall repair. The failure mileage was unknown. Updated 05/31/16*lj

Filed Incident Electrical systemNHTSA 10860241
2011 Forest River SalemBrakesBody, doors & structure

The main frame of the trailer has failed doe to a gross error of the mechanical design in making the front crossmember too thin to support the weight of the trailer. Additionally, the requirement to use a load leveler by the dealer as recommended by the manufacturer increases this load to the point that the calculated safety margin of the crossmember that supports the tongue is 1:1. The crossmember material is standard a36 steel with a nominal thickness of .1 Inches and is bent in the shape of a c channel, welded...

Read the full complaint

to the front of a 10 inch i-beam which comprises the majority of the load bearing structure of the main frame. The front crossmember in question is used as a support point for the underslung tongue that is welded to the lowermost point of the I beam and the front crossmember creating a fulcrum ratio of approximately 2.896 : 1. The lever being the tongue tubing itself that is then pushed upward into the front crossmember with a force of 2400 pounds as calculated using a measured tongue weight of 830 pounds with the vehicle completely unloaded of all cargo and wastewater and with empty propane cylinders. This force is supported by a tongue comprised of a 2x6 rectangular tubing with a nominal wall thickness of .098 Inches that has deformed longitudinally and expanded laterally across the short axis directly under the front crossmemeber. The front crossmember has then receded into the underbelly of the camper and begun a vertical crack that has compromised the handling characteristics of both the tow vehicle and the trailer at speed. Additionally, the electrical braking system has failed due to other design flaws in the protection of wiring within the wheel and the design of the mechanical actuation that impinges on the wiring harnesses freedom of movement while being actuated. *Tr

Filed Incident Service brakes, hydraulic · StructureNHTSA 10447180
2011 Forest River SalemSuspensionFire

Tl* the contact owns a 2011 forrest river salem. The contact stated while driving 65 mph, another driver alerted her that the rear of the vehicle was on fire. The vehicle was maneuvered to the shoulder. The contact extinguished the fire, which was located on the rear axle. The vehicle was towed to an independent repair shop and the contact was informed that the rear axle melted due to a bearing failure. The vehicle was repaired. The approximate failure mileage was 1,000.

Filed Incident SuspensionNHTSA 10435453
2001 Forest River SalemWheels & tires

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 forest river salem rv light with tow master st tires sixe 205 75/14. The drivers side rear tire and the front passenger side tire blew out. Both tires had 2,000 miles on them when the failure occurred. The contact stated that two tires on the vehicle failed on two consecutive days. The contact took the vehicle to the tire dealer and was told that the other three tires tread belt was shredding and they needed to be replaced as well. The tire dealer replaced the tires and suggested the contact call the manufacturer regarding the failure. The dot for all five tires was 5310sph4609. The failure mileage was 2,000.

Filed Incident TiresNHTSA 10427860
2008 Forest River SalemSuspension

Tl* the contact owns a 2008 forest river salem trailer. The contact stated that both front and rear axles were severely damaged. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who advised that the four leaf springs were poorly designed and dangerous. The vehicle was repaired. The manufacturer was made aware problem. The failure and current mileage was unknown.

Filed Incident SuspensionNHTSA 10416621

Questions about the Forest River Salem

Which Forest River Salem years have the most problems?

By the number of complaints owners filed with NHTSA: 2008 (3), 2001 (2), 2011 (2). Allowing for how long each has been on the road, the 2011 stands out most. Complaint counts also rise with sales, so compare years of the same model rather than different models.

Which Forest River Salem years have the fewest complaints?

Among model years that have been on the road for at least three years, 1997, 1998, 1999 have the best Safety Index - the fewest complaints, crashes and recalls for their age compared with other Salem years. Always check the exact vehicle's recalls by VIN before you buy.

What are the most common Forest River Salem problems?

Across every model year, owners report problems with the suspension (3), wheels & tires (2), body, doors & structure (2) most often.

How many recalls does the Forest River Salem have?

NHTSA lists 64 recalls across all Forest River Salem model years. Each year's page lists the recalls for that year; check your own vehicle by VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls to see whether the repair has been done.

Source: U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) complaints and recalls, checked daily. Complaints are owners' own reports and are not verified. How we use the data

Owners helping owners

Know before you drive.

Every experience you share - good or bad - shows on that vehicle's page and helps the next owner and buyer. Two minutes, anonymous.

Share your experience