Jaguar I-PACE Electrical problems by year

attempting to operate the vehicle. It remains stranded on the street. This incident also caused me to miss a scheduled medical appointment. This is not the first high-voltage system problem with my vehicle. During an earlier visit to the same authorized Jaguar dealership, technicians documented a high-voltage system isolation fault and performed recall action H570. I paid approximately $270 for the initial diagnosis. The dealership then quoted an additional $4,233 plus tax to continue investigating the fault. Now, before that underlying problem has been resolved, my vehicle has suffered a much more serious failure involving the braking system and complete loss of vehicle operation. When I contacted the dealership, I was directed to Jaguar Roadside Assistance, which quoted towing charges starting at $125, depending on distance. At the same time, the dealer service manager called me back saying no technicians available for my car until next Thursday, so I stopped paying for the road assistance. The car is now still sitting on the street near my home. I am deeply concerned about the safety and reliability of this vehicle, particularly because the braking-system warning and reduced braking effectiveness occurred while the vehicle was moving.

artificially capped my vehicle's battery charge at 90%, significantly degrading the vehicle's driving range, usability, and value without resolving the underlying physical defect. The vehicle has been serviced and documented by an authorized Jaguar dealership for the interim recall software installation, meaning the manufacturer is fully aware of this specific vehicle's affected status. The vehicle was flagged directly by the manufacturer via a formal safety recall notice regarding battery fire risks. Following the interim dealer software update, the vehicle now displays a permanent restriction limiting the maximum state of charge to 90%.

California DMV and Waymo. Fortunately, there were collisions as a result of the Waymo's traffic violation (driving the wrong way into oncoming traffic). INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

struck an object. After the most recent "High Voltage" trip/shudder, the max state of charge auto-dropped from 80% to 72%. It had previously been limited from 100% to 80% without my consent. HVAC failure: The A/C has NOT worked properly in ~2 years. In humid/rainy FL conditions the windshield cannot be cleared for hours, and I cannot drive safely until it does. Each fault occurrence has been photographed/dated. Safety concerns Reduced braking feel, traction battery, restricted power, high voltage system faults**, and impaired visibility are safety-critical on any vehicle. On an I-PACE they sit alongside a KNOWN thermal runaway fire risk in the high voltage battery that Jaguar and NHTSA have cleared from the record. Status JaguarUSA/NHTSA's VIN lookup both show no open recall for this VIN. I have not received any type of, or documentation regarding a completed remedy, and the Jaguar dealer where I bought and serviced the vehicle (Tampa) has closed. Jaguar Orlando refuses to return my calls requesting records or action regarding the safety issue. If any remedy was recorded as "completed", the failures above indicate it was in NO WAY effective. Requests Review this VIN's recall completion history, including the date, servicing dealer, and repair order for every recall remedy recorded. Evaluate the adequacy of the recall remedy for H536/H514 in light of this report. Have an ODI investigator confirm, in writing, the complaint# & a point of contact.

90% and has recommended that the vehicle be charged outdoors because of the battery fire risk. Although these interim precautions have been implemented, I remain concerned about the unresolved battery safety defect and the length of time Jaguar has taken to provide a permanent repair or other definitive remedy. The charging restriction reduces the vehicle's usable battery capacity, and the recommendation to charge outdoors creates additional inconvenience and concern about safely owning and charging this vehicle. I ask NHTSA to review the length of time this recall has remained without a permanent remedy, the adequacy of the interim measures, and whether Jaguar is providing an effective and timely resolution to affected owners. Please record this complaint as a concern regarding the ongoing safety risk and the delay in providing a permanent recall remedy.

concerning. Today the vehicle produced a severe physical shudder and automatically reduced charge capacity from 80% to 72% - a new and concerning development; i'd also like to note that Jaguar's battery warranty explicitly calls a battery defective at 70%. Where some more severe cases were initially reduced to 72% charge by the Jaguar dealerships, my car was set to 80% until today. I have photographed each fault occurrence for documentation. I contacted Jaguar Orlando service to speak with a technician or manager regarding these escalating faults. After a five-minute hold I was informed they have not serviced this vehicle in two years and that someone would call me back. No callback has been received. JLR/Morley's repurchase offer, submitted after years of delay and multiple document requests, does not reflect the recall-driven depreciation this vehicle has suffered. I have not accepted it and they have once again "closed my case" which i hope is NOT being reported to NHTSA. I did not "decline", I simply did not accept to play into their coercive tactics. These are not intermittent or minor issues. This vehicle presents an active, documented, and worsening safety risk as it deteriorates on the street due to the harsh Florida climate. I am requesting escalation to an ODI investigator. Contact: [[redacted]] | [[redacted]] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

February 5, 2026 filing. The vehicle has its original battery pack and every prior recall completed. The park-outside instruction is not practical where I live, and the 90% limit leaves about 160 miles of range, so the car cannot reach the dealer without a charging stop. I asked Jaguar Land Rover North America for a repurchase on April 20 and July 10, 2026. On April 23 they refused a review as "outside of the manufacturer warranty period." That was wrong: I bought the car from Jaguar Des Moines on [[redacted]] as a Jaguar Approved Certified Pre-Owned vehicle, and Jaguar's own CPO delivery checklist lists the CPO warranty expiration as [[redacted]]. The 8-year/100,000-mile battery warranty runs to [[redacted]]. The July request got no reply. JLR's Part 573 report for 26V-067 states that for the 2019 model year with the same defect, JLR decided on [[redacted]] to reacquire the vehicles because "battery pack supply is heavily constrained." The 2020 vehicles carry the same at-risk cells, and no remedy has been offered. I am reporting this vehicle as one for which the manufacturer has not provided a remedy in a timely manner. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

the problem continued. The most serious issue occurred when I repeatedly requested that the vehicle stop so I could exit. I told Rider Support that I wanted to end the ride and get out. After support attempted to verbally navigate the vehicle, I again requested that it stop at a safe location so I could exit and walk the remaining distance. The vehicle continued moving after I requested to stop and exit. At that point, I repeatedly yelled for the vehicle to stop and let me out because I did not feel I had control over when I could leave the vehicle. The vehicle eventually stopped and unlocked the doors. There was no collision or impact. No emergency crews responded. I am unaware of any warning lights or messages before the incident, and I do not know whether a traffic violation occurred. My primary safety concern is that an autonomous vehicle continued moving after a passenger repeatedly requested to end the ride and exit. I believe this incident warrants investigation as a potential autonomous-vehicle passenger safety issue.

incident. Links are on the uploaded screenshots. I do not know the license plate number of the Jaguar that made this illegal turn. The license number on this report is for a Waymo Jaguar, but may not be the one I saw on 7/25/26.

on the keychain: [[redacted]] at 6:28 PM; [[redacted]] around 6:53 PM; [[redacted]] around 7:50 PM. Waymo lost-item cases: [[redacted]] / [[redacted]] and [[redacted]] / [[redacted]]. The keys were still not recovered as of 11 PM. License plate: [[redacted]]. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

reacquire the vehicles,"....a plan of which JLR told the USDOT it would notify owners of on April 3, 2026. As of today, I have yet to receive JLR's independent notification that my iPace was not safe to charge indoors (which I have done for the duration of my ownership of the vehicle, until I learned of the recall on or about August 20, 2026 through my independent internet search for iPace recall.) I have yet to have been offered a reacquisition of my vehicle, yet I can, now only charge up to 176 miles or 80% and I can no longer park overnight in my garage while charging. It appears JLR was aware of this defect as early as the year 2020, but concealed this in the internet advertisement for the vehicle and the sales paperwork that I was provided to purchase the vehicle on April 28, 2021, facts which, if communicated, would have resulted in my not having purchased an iPace. I stumbled upon this information after the "traction battery fault" indicator illuminating in mid-August 2026, when my Jaguar service advisor told me there "was a recall on the car that they cannot fix." JLRs handling of the recall with respect to reacquiring affected vehicles is not as it discussed with the USDOT. JLR has not reacquired all H570/1/2, cars. As a retired DOT OIG agent, I question whether JLR made material omissions or misreps' about the iPace's battery defects or about Jaguar's intent to reacquire the 2,278 iPaces, to the USDOT to preclude crim' or reg' investigation.