Latest vehicle complaints

gear, it introduces a severe human-factors safety risk during low-speed maneuvers. A driver relying on muscle memory expects the car to brake when the pedal is lifted, but the unexpected low-speed creep requires an urgent, secondary foot transition to the physical brake pedal. This lack of software configuration increases the risk of low-speed collisions and pedal misapplication during backing maneuvers. Requesting a software update from the manufacturer to make One-Pedal Driving behaviors or vehicle creep fully optional and independently toggleable when operating the vehicle in reverse gear.

to the VW dealership where I purchased the vehicle to get an inspection and when I told the service center the symptoms, they said it was probably the cylinder head, its a common issue with my engine type. Then after inspection, the service center told us to look up the issue online to see if there are any class action lawsuits as this is such a common issue with my engine type.

limited any of that. They all have the same indented left hand bracket that is causing mold on the interior of the car, some worse than others, and I spoke to the people that own the cars, the ones that are parked in a garage or car covered, they have less mold, the people that parked their cars outside have more mold. But they all have the same bracket on the left-hand side that is screwed up. I'm attaching photos to show the amount of mold damage we have taken, and so much more.

present when cruse control is active at freeway speeds -Does break automatically on reverse 5- 11FOZ03 - Recall noted on service documentation. 6- No over the air firmware pushed to vehicle Vehicle currently Dealer, Car has been there since 10/19. Car lost complete power while dealer technician was driving for testing. Updates from dealer is that KIA is still diagnosing the electrical issue.

committed consumer fraud by falsifying safety inspection records and failing to perform any diagnostic work, leaving me to drive an unsafe vehicle. Toyota Corporate Case Management is now using this fraudulent lack of replication to deny my coverage under Customer Support Program 20TE03."

actuator and ABS pump so I wouldn't have to worry about that repair. All told he said he spent $4000+ on the repair. When the car was driving I heard a high pitched whine. I took it to garages after my OBD tools could not identify the issue, no one had a fix and speculated that it was a power inverter and it was normal. Some weeks later, I was involved in an accident where the car did not stop in time, the brake went spongy and locked up, ABS failed to activate with no warnings or indicators. This is what first led me to suspect something wrong with the ABS. later the persistent whine was loud enough that I could identify that it was hydraulic in nature, pointing to the brakes. Within weeks the whine had stopped and my brake, ABS, and TCS lights came on, on the cluster. My OBD indicated that the ABS pump and Brake actuator were giving codes to the ECM. I replace it, and at about 240,000mi it went out again. Due to the extremely expensive nature of the part I purchased a used part which is now also bad. Toyota informed me that they have no intention of passing a recall notice or fixing the defective part. I would imagine that if the NHSTA looked into crashes involving this model and year group they would see an unusually high trend of these getting into an accident around 100,000mi increments. I believe that a recall should be issued due to the serious safety implications of potential defective cars on the road that may not be able to brake in time.

October 2026 check engine light came on. Manual stated light meant exhaust system malfunction. Vehicle serviced at VW Service Center 10/02/2026. Diagnosis summary invoice: Fault Code FL03 Fuel Tank. Replace causing p0441 fault and sucking tank inward. It was determined that the fuel tank was sucked inward. Explanation: gas tank vapors were not dissipating properly. Mechanic/Dealership recommended replacing fuel tank. In addition, I was provided a video stating this recommendation. Estimated cost $2,075.00 plus tax. I was provided a loaner while my vehicle was in the Service Center. Picked up my vehicle 10/08/2026. Cost: $218.31. Check Engine Light: October 2026 check engine light came on. Problem was the same. 10/06/26 Fault with EVAP System Vent Citric /Circuit. Diagnosis summary invoice: Replace the EVAP Canister assembly with LDP, N80 and clean purge line of compressed air. Cost: $37.29 Same Component Issue: October 2026 check engine light came on evening of 10/12/2026. Returned vehicle to VW Service Center and I provided another loaner vehicle. Diagnosis summary invoice: Found Radiator Grill Shutter failed. Radiator Grill Shutter replaced and necessary systems recalibrated. Cost: $257.33. VW Service Center determined that there were no cracks in the gas tank, therefore the Service Center did not replace the gas tank because my vehicle is out of warranty. This "sucked in" gas tank is through no fault. I am seeking full compensation to replace my gas tank.

of secondary critical alerts flashed across the information display, including a "Lane Assist System Problem," effectively disabling the vehicle's automated driver-assist, traction, and stability networks. This total electronic network blackout culminated moments later in a severe collision that caused significant structural damage, including a snapped front axle. Despite the force of the impact meeting the necessary physical criteria for severe crash deceleration, the vehicle's Supplemental Restraint System (SRS) completely failed, and none of the airbags deployed

match the performance of the original equipment lower pan on specified Ford and Lincoln vehicles Trustworthy quality - backed by a team of product experts in the United States and more than a century of automotive experience Ensure fit - Input your vehicle into the garage tool and check Confirmed Fit bar at the top of the page. If there is an "i" in a blue circle, additional verification is needed. Please hover over the "i" to verify fitment notes match your vehicle. After changing the pan I experienced that during acceleration such as on ramp, merging, or passing engine would suddenly lose all power, Fords warning chime would alert me and message on dashboard- Low Engine Oil Pressure - it takes the system a while to regain power again. This could have serious consequences if you were passing or trying to merge and the engine totally shuts down. Afterwards, I reviewed the Dorman design and discovered that they didn't add a baffling to the oil sump pickup and only provided a. slot in the pickup tube. The original pan has a baffle which keeps the oil flowing into the engine. This is a serious flaw which could cause injury not to mention destruction of the engine due to oil starvation. I have contacted Dorman and they are requesting purchase information for a refund. More needs to be done before someone gets hurt.

information during operation of the Hands-Free Assist system. This creates a safety concern because I cannot reliably see the intended visual indication of the driver-assistance system's status. I experienced a near-miss situation in which the absence of the expected blue visual indication contributed to confusion about the system's status. The problem has been repeatedly observed, including during a check conducted with dealership personnel. I have brought this nearly new vehicle to an authorized Subaru dealership twice for the same issue. Despite my specific report that the blue indicators do not illuminate, the dealership initially stated that the vehicle was operating as designed, relying in part on an assessment of Hands-Free Assist functionality rather than providing a documented diagnosis addressing the blue indicators themselves. The dealership subsequently agreed to arrange further inspection by its shop foreman after I escalated the concern to the manufacturer. However, I have not received a satisfactory technical explanation or confirmation that the blue indicators are functioning as specified. The vehicle remains available for inspection. I have videos and photographs documenting the indicator issue, as well as communications with the dealership and service records. I am concerned that the failure of these visual indicators could prevent drivers from recognizing important changes in driver-assistance system status. I request that NHTSA investiga

professional diagnosis confirmed a failing front lower control arm and ball joint, creating a structural failure and an immediate risk of component separation, which threatens a total loss of steering control. This safety defect first manifested as a persistent noise last year while the vehicle was still well under the 84,000-mile mark when I took it in to have my transmission fluid changed. However, I thought it pertained to my front brakes and the repair man said when he drove it, he didn't hear the noise. But I continued to hear the noise when I braked in the front area. So, when I recently checked my 17-digit VIN on the official recall portal, after the inspection of my vehicle during an oil change, is when I was told about the front suspension. My vehicle shows "0 Open Recalls." Nissan Corporate Consumer Affairs refused to offer assistance or a goodwill repair due to the current mileage (99,488 miles), stating my VIN was excluded from the campaign. Because my vehicle is experiencing the exact structural defect, manufacturing flaw, and safety risk outlined in Campaign PC797, I am filing this complaint to urge the NHTSA to investigate and mandate an expansion of the recall footprint to include excluded VIN blocks. I have paid $680 out-of-pocket to Torrance Motors to replace the defective control arm and perform a mandatory wheel alignment to keep the vehicle road-safe. I retain all itemized repair receipts for future reimbursement verification.