Latest vehicle complaints

damage, both lower control arms and both upper control arms required replacement. The suspension failure also caused severe damage and abnormal wear to the driver's-side front tire, which resulted in the replacement of all four tires. This condition involved critical steering and suspension components and raises serious safety concerns regarding vehicle handling, suspension durability, tire wear, and the potential for loss of vehicle control. The severity of the component failures was discovered only after the vehicle was inspected for the steering noise. I am submitting this complaint because I believe this may represent a safety-related defect that could affect other Tesla Model Y vehicles.

although I do not know what system was responsible. I stopped and inspected everything finding nothing wrong so proceeded to drive the car back home. The vehicle then suddenly and forcefully applied the brakes without any input from me. The rear wheels appeared to lock, causing the tires to skid. The back end of the vehicle fishtailed and began attempting to spin around. I struggled to maintain control. There were three children riding in the vehicle with me. All four occupants were placed in immediate danger. After stopping, I shifted into Park and then back into Drive. The brakes released, and the vehicle began moving normally again. However, I subsequently noticed a continuous metallic grinding noise. No ABS, traction control, or other warning lights illuminated. I am requesting an investigation into the cause of this sudden unintended braking, rear-wheel lockup, and loss of vehicle control. This incident could easily have resulted in a fatal collision. Three children were passengers in the vehicle when it unexpectedly applied its own brakes at approximately 45 mph.

know that it falls under the warranty and they ordered a battery should arrive Dec 15 2026 at the earliest. Called the dealership to verify. They said yes its ordered. 2 days later Stellantis called us and said they canceled the order and it will not be covered under the warranty recall because of our van is over the milage for the recall. She told us to take it to another dealership to see what they say. That would be the 3rd time we done that and this is what they keep telling us. Our van is at the dealership off road because its a fire hazard and can not be driven and they will not honor the recall 52d, Id-25-13 for unlimited miles. Were stuck with no recall getting taking care of. The only option we have is to contact our lawyer and he will be handling this moving forward. Hopefully Stellantis and Chrysler will be 100% held accountable for there actions. I really dont understand how some people can sleep at night knowing they put people at such a high risk of dieing from their vehicle catching fire and expecting people to accept that as its ok. Big safety issue!!!

external or wear-and-tear. What You Should Do 1. Document Everything: Take clear, high-resolution photos of the shattered glass, frame, and surrounding area before cleanup or repairs. 2. File a Report: Submit a formal complaint online to the NHTSA Safety Problem Reporting Tool to add your incident to the federal database. 3. Contact Nissan & Insurance: Call your local Nissan dealership to see if they will honor a warranty claim (especially if you are under the 3-year/36,000-mile limit), though you may also need to check with your auto insurance provider regarding glass coverage. If you'd like, tell me: • How many miles are on your 2024 Rogue? • Is your vehicle under the 3-year / 36,000-mile warranty? I can help you look up the best steps for dealing with Nissan or your insurance claim. Reddit·r/NissanRogue 2024 Rouge Back Window Exploded? : r/NissanRogue - Reddit [redacted] - 2024 Rouge Back Window Exploded? r/NissanRogue - 2024 Rouge Back Window Exploded? Hi folks,. We have had our 2024 Rouge for about 2 months, and today the back w... 6abc [[redacted]] 'It sounded like a bang': Owners say rear windshields suddenly exploded on their Nissan Rouges | Action News Investigation - 6abc [[redacted]] Issue: Rear windshields spontaneously shattering on 2021-2025 Nissan Rogue SUVs, producing loud gunshot-like bangs and scattering glass. Impact: Dozens of natio... [redacted][[redacted]] 3:15 Owners say rear windshields suddenly exploded on their SUVs INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

vehicle went into limp mode with the same warnings and completely shut down in the middle of the turn. I was able to restart it temporarily and move it to a Circle K parking lot, but when I tried to pull into a parking space it would not start. It was towed to my home in Tucson and has remained inoperable since. No crash, no injury, and no fire occurred. The loss of power while turning was a serious safety risk.

conditions and the danger of attempting to stop on the interstate, I continued driving until I could safely exit the highway several miles later. After exiting, I contacted the dealership and scheduled an appointment to have the vehicle evaluated. I specifically explained that the electronic power steering had failed. A warning light eventually illuminated, although it did not appear immediately when the failure occurred. On or about [redacted], the vehicle underwent replacement of the electronic power steering assembly. The total repair expense was $2,797. Given the seriousness of this incident and the potential for significant injury or loss of life, I contacted Kia Customer Care and requested an investigation into the failure. I have both called and emailed Kia regarding my concerns. My customer care case number is [redacted]. To date, Kia's response has essentially been that the repair is not covered under warranty. I have not received a substantive response addressing the safety implications of the sudden steering failure, the cause of the malfunction, or whether this issue has been experienced by other vehicle owners. The local dealership, Seelye Kia in [[redacted]], confirmed that the replaced electronic power steering component would be available for inspection, as I advised them that I intended to submit a formal safety complaint. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

The auto engine shutoff feature for gas engine Kia vehicles is noted by the Kia dealer to be a problem that can sometimes put the car in compromising positions. The feature has been inspected by the dealer, and the feature works as design intended. The only remedy that the Kia dealer service person offered was to tell me to purchase a $100+ bypass wiring harness that will cause the feature to always be turned off. The only acceptable remedy in my opinion would be for Kia to be held financially responsible to permanently disable the auto shutoff feature for my vehicle.

tow truck, leave car running and get it to them. Opened complaint with corporate. No help. I am afraid to drive my car. This could cause a major accident and harm myself or others. Asked dealership if they could contact an engineer and was told no.

issued a safety recall addressing the same rearview camera defect I had been experiencing. In [redacted], I contacted Stockton Acura's service department regarding the recall. They acknowledged the recall but informed me they did not expect to receive the replacement parts needed to complete the repair for the foreseeable future. They could not provide an estimated repair date. This defective camera creates an ongoing safety hazard because I cannot reliably see pedestrians, children, vehicles, or obstacles behind my vehicle while reversing. The problem has persisted despite the dealership's attempted software update. I am requesting that NHTSA investigate this safety defect, the dealership's initial determination that the camera was operating normally, and Acura's inability to provide replacement parts or a reasonable repair timeframe. I should not be forced to continue driving with compromised rear visibility indefinitely because the manufacturer cannot provide the necessary recall remedy. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

slack adjuster. Before departure, the driver performed a pre-trip inspection with the engine running. The driver reported hearing no air leak and noticing no loss of air pressure or difficulty braking. It is unknown whether a dashboard warning appeared. The repair shop confirmed that the brake chamber was leaking air. All three cited defects were corrected. Similar brake problems have occurred on this truck before. My concern is that they could recur while the truck is in service and affect its ability to stop safely before the driver notices a problem. The connection to the recalled valve remains unconfirmed.