Latest vehicle complaints

excessive speed. The human driver remains responsible for safe, lawful operation and faces possible speeding tickets. I have read reports describing maximum-speed control as an "anti-pattern." I do not consider that an adequate safety justification for removing a preventive control. Learning a driver's preferences should operate within an explicit speed ceiling. I believe Tesla has the engineering capability to develop and validate a solution that preserves both FSD functionality and effective driver control. I request NHTSA investigate and require a remedy if a safety defect is established. My position is that affected FSD systems should not operate on public roads without an enforceable driver-selected maximum speed, independent of driving profile. Manual braking and disengagement remain necessary but do not replace this preventive safeguard. I welcome contact from Tesla and am willing to collaborate on a solution. My willingness to help does not diminish my request for restoration of this safety control. Contact details are provided separately in this complaint. Exact software version and change date: UNKNOWN. Dealer/service-center confirmation: UNKNOWN. Inspection by Tesla, police, an insurer, or others: UNKNOWN. Prior warning lamps/messages: UNKNOWN. Availability for inspection: UNKNOWN.

the failure was documented as "could not replicate," and I was instructed to return if it happened again. The fault continues to occur. The same failure pattern was documented on both March and October 2026 visits. NHTSA Campaign 19V-654 / Infiniti R1911 recalled 2018-2019 QX60 vehicles for rear-view camera image failures. My vehicle's camera blanks completely and intermittently and is repaired only by a full power cycle, a different failure mode on the same safety-critical component. The condition has been reported during the warranty term and was never truly repaired.

airbags may fail to deploy in a crash or may deploy unexpectedly. The vehicle has also recorded code C1130, an ABS module communication fault, and was included in NHTSA recall 19V-807 for ABS actuator inspection, showing this generation has documented electronic control faults. The intermittent warning has never been diagnosed or repaired, and the warranty term has since ended. The vehicle is currently at the dealership for diagnosis.

INFINITI dealer March 2026 but they could not replicate. This model line has documented steering and chassis issues: NHTSA campaign 21V-402 recalled 2020-2021 QX60 vehicles for steering knuckle and rear axle housing failures; the 2019 model year sits in the same generation. The vehicle has approximately 67,500 miles.

traveling within its designated lane when it approached a highway maintenance truck equipped with a rear-mounted crash attenuator. The maintenance truck appeared to be moving slowly in the same lane. Despite Adaptive Cruise Control controlling vehicle speed, the Subaru did not adequately slow to avoid the collision. The driver reported no effective forward collision warning or automatic emergency braking intervention. Whether the system detected the equipment or attempted braking is UNKNOWN. The impact caused extensive front-end damage and airbag deployment. The driver was pregnant, and two children, ages [[redacted]] and [[redacted]], were passengers. All occupants and the unborn child were placed at significant risk of serious injury. Whether any EyeSight warnings, fault messages, or diagnostic trouble codes were present before impact is UNKNOWN. The suspected malfunction has not been reproduced or confirmed by a dealership or independent service center. A manufacturer engineering inspection has not been confirmed. Photographs document the accident scene and vehicle damage. The extent of police or insurance technical inspections and the vehicle's current availability for inspection are UNKNOWN. An investigation is requested into Adaptive Cruise Control, forward object detection, and Pre-Collision Braking, including preservation and review of available electronic collision data to establish why the systems did not prevent or effectively mitigate the collision. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

October 10, 2026 and recorded as not duplicated. The fault remains and leaves the driver without a trustworthy indication of remaining fuel, creating a risk of unexpected fuel exhaustion. This is a documented issue type on these vehicles: INFINITI has issued service bulletins on fuel gauge/DTE indication faults (including ITB22-015 and ITB14-036). The repair was performed during the INFINITI Elite CPO warranty term and never succeeded; the vehicle is currently being diagnosed by the dealer again.

and EV operation was unavailable. The dealer performed FCA 95B high-voltage-battery recall/software work. The problem returned. From 8/8/2025 to 9/12/2025, at 61,447 miles, the dealer diagnosed DTC P0B24, "Hybrid/EV Battery 'A' Voltage Unstable," and documented an internal high-voltage-battery failure causing intermittent no-start conditions. The complete HV battery was replaced. The vehicle was out of service about 35 days. On 10/8/2025, electric mode again became unavailable/intermittent. The dealer diagnosed P0E15-00 and replaced the electric coolant heater. From 10/13/2025 to 10/17/2025, the check-engine light returned after charging; the dealer repaired a coolant-bypass/air-lock condition in the hybrid cooling system. From 6/30/2026 to 8/7/2026, at 80,222 miles, the vehicle returned for "Service Hybrid System" and EV-charging concerns. FCA 68C PHEV HV Battery Fires recall work was performed, and the electric coolant heater was again diagnosed as failed and replaced. The vehicle was out of service about 38 days. On 9/9/2026, Driver's Village advised that the high-voltage battery requires complete replacement again. This would be the vehicle's second complete HV-battery replacement. These major hybrid-related repair episodes total at least about 77 documented days out of service. My primary safety concerns are shutdown/no-start, repeated charging/hybrid-system warnings, failure of the original HV battery, continued failures after recall remedies,

If the oil level drops too low, the engine can experience severe internal friction, leading to scored camshaft journals and rod knock while driving. Ultimately can lead to engine failure. Further, it is an immediate fire hazard, especially in the Crosstrek boxer engine design with the oil commonly dripping downward onto high-temperature exhaust components like the catalytic converter or exhaust manifold. Additionally, oil leaking can travel to the spark plug wells and causes misfires, loss of acceleration, and sudden stalling. Moreover, oil leak destroys electronic and sensors including the wiring harness and serpentine belt. Also, toxic cabin fumes from leaking oil burns can pull into the vehicle's HVAC system and creates an immediate health hazard that can impair driving the vehicle. It is well-documented by Subaru of this issue stemming from factor sealant application (RTV) rather than a wearable maintenance item. Specifically, Technical Service Bulletin TSB 02-192-24 regarding engine oil leak diagnostics. There are 95,000 miles on the Crosstrek only. Subaru Service quoted me $6,101.54 to repair. Please issue a recall on the 2016's Crosstrek to mandate Subaru to fix the dangers at no charge to the customer. Thank you.

October 10, 2026 a CVT fluid drain and refill was flagged due by time and mileage on the multipoint inspection and deferred. The judder symptom is now confirmed by a stored P17F1. All of this was reported while the vehicle was under the INFINITI Elite CPO warranty, which expired August 16, 2026 at only 67,500 miles of its 100,000-mile allowance. This is the same INFINITI CVT covered by service bulletin ITB15-012i for judder diagnosis and repair on 2014-2018 QX60 models, and by the $277.7 million CVT class settlement that extended warranty coverage to 96 months on 2015-2018 QX60s; the 2019 model year is excluded from both. Code C1130 (ABS module reporting engine signal fault) is also stored; INFINITI recall R1917 (NHTSA 19V-807) covers ABS actuator inspection on 2017-2019 QX60 vehicles. The vehicle is currently being diagnosed again by the dealer and a goodwill request will been requested.

reported the malfunction on September 16, 2026, under Repair Order #193555. The dealership retained my vehicle for 45 days, until October 31, with mileage increasing from 32,193 to 32,238. Technicians identified multiple diagnostic trouble codes, inspected camera connections and parking sensors, updated the ECM, HCP, and AHCP modules, performed a proxy alignment, and test-drove the vehicle. I was also informed of wiring harness investigations and steering wheel sensor problems. Manufacturer STAR technical assistance cases were opened, and Alfa Romeo Customer Care was involved under Case #98208723. Despite manufacturer involvement and the extended repair period, the dealership declared the vehicle operating correctly. The malfunction persisted immediately after pickup, including two unintended lane departures. The exact cause remains undiagnosed. No warning lights or messages appear during these incidents. The vehicle is available for inspection. No collision or police or insurance inspection has occurred.

message and illuminates both the ABS warning light and the TCS/DSC (Traction Control / Dynamic Stability Control) indicator light. However, as soon as the braking event ends, all warning lights and the error message turn off automatically on their own without needing to restart the vehicle. Because the fault clears itself immediately during the drive, there is no active warning on the dashboard showing that the ABS, TCS/DSC, and Smart Brake systems are compromised until the next high-speed emergency braking situation occurs. Vehicle diagnostic scans recorded error codes U3003-16-68 (Circuit voltage below threshold), U0316-09-08 (Error signal received from DSC/ABS module), and B13D3-16-8A. The vehicle has been inspected and serviced twice by an authorized Mazda dealership for this exact safety defect: on 8-Sep-2026, the dealership replaced the 12V vehicle battery, and on Oct-5-2026, the dealership replaced the ABS module. Neither repair resolved the issue, and on both occasions the dealership returned the vehicle claiming it was fixed. Testing the brakes confirmed the defect persists: under hard braking, the ABS still cuts out after 1 to 2 seconds, locks the wheels, and momentarily triggers the ABS light, TCS/DSC light, and "Smart Brake System Malfunction" warning before clearing itself again.

wanted to be. The truck was a "high off the ground" kind of rig and I wonder if the collision avoidance was literally looking under it. I agree that the driver is ultimately responsible for his vehicle but IMO it is scary if a warning system doesn't do its job. The official 2025 Honda CR-V owner's manual, in the section titled Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) with Low Speed Follow, lists several situations in which the system may fail to detect a vehicle correctly. Two of those limitations are especially relevant to my experience: - A vehicle ahead has an unusual shape. - The minimum ground clearance of a vehicle ahead is extremely high. Honda also warns that detection can be compromised when the speed difference between my vehicle and the vehicle ahead is very large. We were able to avoid colliding with the vehicle in front of us, but only because we noticed that we were rapidly closing on the vehicle in front of us.

later diagnosed excessive rear tire wear caused by improper rear toe settings and performed a 4-wheel alignment. I am concerned the recall repair was not properly completed or the alignment was not properly performed, resulting in unsafe handling and rapid tire wear. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

recall repair, the vehicle exhibited the exact same symptoms as before (excessive oil consumption / engine malfunction) - the recall remedy was ineffective. The engine defect symptoms persisted unchanged. The complainant subsequently surrendered the vehicle and no longer possesses it. No crash, fire, injury, or death resulted from this complaint. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

Monday. It will be towed to an auction place in [[redacted]] and Hyundai as asked to evaluate the car before anything is done to it. I have asked my insurance agent to arrange that with the auction house. There was no warning prior to this happening. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)