Latest vehicle complaints

flush treats the symptom, not the cause. GM was permitted to put a band aid on a problem to get the vehicle through any warranty and make it not their responsible. The vehicle was returned to me, even after I complained to the dealer that this was not fixing the problem. And the truck continued to have a pause in the shifting. On about [redacted] the shuddering became much more apparent. I made an appointment with this same dealer that had done all of my service. On about [redacted] they did confirm the the problem was the torque converter. At this point the truck was no longer under the warranty, so GM had succeeded in putting the replacement of the faulty torque converter on me the consumer. As a consumer I feel I have been failed by a system we have in place to protect consumers from dishonest Corporate transactions. This process cost me $4000.00 out of pocket, and 11 days without the use of my truck. All of this transpired, because GM decided to not do what was right and fix what they knew was defective. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

primary engine wiring harness and ignition coil packs. The vehicle is currently grounded and completely disabled at Buster Miles Kia ([[redacted]]), where the service department confirmed the melted harness and issued a repair estimate of $3,813.85. Kia Corporate Customer Care has consolidated my files and issued a flat denial of coverage on their behalf, stating that the SC284 recall remedy is strictly limited to the physical installation of a lower-amperage HECU fuse. Kia is forcing me to pay out-of-pocket for the melted wiring harness caused directly by their defective components. Under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, a manufacturer's safety remedy is legally incomplete if the defect's failure mode leaves the vehicle in an unsafe, disabled condition. Changing a fuse does not remedy a vehicle that has already suffered consequential thermal damage from the defect itself. I request federal intervention into Kia America's refusal to cover safety-related consequential property damage, leaving a consumer stranded without a safe vehicle due to a known fire risk defect. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

vehicles in front or behind us. The vehicle began to jerk forward and stop hard, if we proceeded, which we could do, limping the SUV, on back streets, only 1/2 mile from dealership. Once at dealership at Ford in Seaside, California, they ran diagnostics, and re-calibrated the faulty module(s), that may have caused this. Fast forward to [redacted], while at stop sign in [[redacted]], we proceeded at slow speed, maybe 10mph or so, and SUV abruptly braked on us and came to complete stop, with warning on instrument display. We pulled over, shutoff vehicle for a minute or so, turned back on and were able to drive again normally. We took a chance, and a few days later, drove vehicle up to the dealership (The Ford Store, Morgan Hill, California) to diagnose. They had it for a few days, and determined the Electronic Brake Booster module needed replaced and whatever they did additionally, like re-calibrations, etc. We're crossing our fingers we don't encounter problem(s). SUV is under warrantly, still, and we did purchase an extended warranty when we purchased it, new, back in XX . We're just praying this doesn't happen if we're driving at a high speed. Never had problems with our three previous Ford Explorers. Of course, these 2025s and newer ones have extensive electronics. Needless to say, my wife is scared this issue might happen again. We can't be the only Ford Explorer or Ford vehicle that might have encountered these issues? INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

drives normally again until this problem reoccurs, which may be weeks or months later. I've examined the possible reasons that this is happening and have eliminated the possibility of the car mat or pressing the wrong pedal or both pedals at the same time. I've tried to press both pedals at the same time on purpose with the car off to check if this is possible, and am unable to press both pedals without my foot slipping between the pedals. I've also experienced the power steering warning light illuminate a few times upon starting the car, upon which the car has no power steering. Turning the car off and then back on again has solved that problem.

diagnosis. However, the visible damage raises additional safety concerns given the known defect described in the recall. Despite the observed damage, obtaining the recall repair has been difficult because the authorized Land Rover dealership willing and able to perform the repair is more than 200 miles from the vehicle's location. I contacted Land Rover Roadside Assistance, the dealership, and Land Rover Customer Relations to request transportation assistance. All declined to arrange or reimburse transportation. Land Rover subsequently confirmed in writing that it would not provide transportation reimbursement or an alternative transportation arrangement. Commercial vehicle transportation was estimated at approximately $3,000. Because the vehicle has been sitting and needs to be returned to operational condition, I am arranging and paying for transportation to the authorized dealership to obtain the recall repair. I am requesting that NHTSA review the circumstances, including the visible damage to the recalled component, the manufacturer's refusal to assist with transportation, and the substantial out-of-pocket expense required to obtain the safety recall remedy. I am also requesting consideration of reimbursement for reasonable transportation expenses incurred to obtain the repair. The vehicle has not yet received a formal inspection of the damaged component by the dealership. I can provide photographs, mechanic observations, transportation invoices,

for approximately two weeks without experiencing any transmission problems. Before the recall update, the truck shifted normally and had no check-engine light or noticeable transmission slipping. Immediately after the PCM update, I began experiencing the following problems: * Transmission slipping in 5th and 6th gears. * Engine RPM increasing without the truck gaining speed. * Sudden loss of pulling power. * Transmission slamming hard when the gear catches. * Diagnostic trouble code P0740. I returned to the dealership and was told that the PCM accepted the software update and that it installed correctly. However, the vehicle was never road-tested after the update. I understand that the vehicle has high mileage, but the transmission was operating normally before the recall service. I am requesting: 1. A complete transmission diagnostic. 2. Verification of the PCM calibration and software compatibility. 3. Investigation of the relationship between the PCM update and the transmission symptoms. 4. A road test with diagnostic equipment, if safe. 5. A technical assistance case with Stellantis. 6. A written explanation of the findings and recommended repairs. I am not asking anyone to assume responsibility without an investigation. I am asking that the sudden change in vehicle operation immediately following the recall service be taken seriously. Please document this complaint and provide a written response. Thank you.

approximately 10 times specifically for this metallic B-pillar rattle. Lexus Corporate has also been involved for months and even sent a corporate field tech to pinpoint the noise. Despite this, the issue remains unresolved. I also personally investigated by removing the B-pillar trim and confirmed the sound is coming directly from the seat belt mechanism at the base of the B-pillar. Please see the service records attached. Yes. It has been inspected repeatedly by Lexus of Tacoma, and by a Lexus corporate. No warning lamps or messages. The only symptom is a persistent metallic ticking/rattle from the B-pillar area over bumpy roads, first noticed shortly after delivery. I have also experienced the identical defect on a separate 2026 GX 550 I own, indicating a possible pattern. Additionally, many owners on the GX 550 and Land Cruiser forums (LC250, which share the same body) report the same B-pillar rattle, indicating a widespread pattern.

replicated by the service department at Lexus of Bellevue. I also personally investigated by removing the B-pillar trim and confirmed the sound is emanating directly from the seat belt mechanism at the base of the pillar. The vehicle has been inspected by the dealership (Lexus of Bellevue), who confirmed the noise. No warning lamps or messages appeared. The only symptom is a persistent metallic ticking/rattle from the B-pillar area, audible when driving over bumpy roads or driving in general , first noticed shortly after taking delivery of the vehicle (at 0 miles.)

highway traffic without full vehicle control. This occurs repeatedly/weekly, presenting an immediate collision hazard from rear-end traffic. [Dealership Response & Diagnostic Proof]: A diagnostic scan confirms a permanent P1326 knock sensor code, which points directly to the Knock Sensor Detection System (KSDS) monitoring engine bearing failure. Despite presenting diagnostic logs to the local dealership, they have refused to execute the necessary powertrain warranty or engine failure repairs mandated under safety settlement terms, leaving a defective, stalling vehicle on public roads.

operating the Volkswagen without the rear back up camera, having no music, infotainment lights, no Bluetooth available to make calls safely as we are a hand free state here in [[redacted]] as it pertains to cellphone usage in the car. We took our car to a local VW dealer in [[redacted]] and it was diagnosed with the control module 005f not working and it could not communicate with the vehicle. The service advisor said this is 005f control module has been a common issue recently in VW Atlas and Tiguans. The part is on back order in [[redacted]] and out of the safety of our family and especially the children we drive in our VW Atlas we gave in an ordered the 00f5 module. We have yet to receive it and have it installed and still drive with a complete non-working infotainment system including no back up camera, warning notifications, no Bluetooth, no lights, etc. There was no warning really that this would go out but we are in dire need to get it repaired and get the safety standards back in the vehicle. Lastly, in addition our vehicle just went past the warranty mileage and this module and its installation are very costly. This is a huge safety concern that could arise for many other families across [[redacted]]. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

would be covered and gave me a program number. The dealership also outlined (21TA02) in the estimate. After the vehicle had already been towed, the dealer declined coverage because of mileage and is charging me for diagnosis. I have opened a case with Toyota corporate and it has been escalated. I am asking NHTSA to review and support the replacement of the fuel pump for my vehicle. If diagnosis does not result in the fuel pump, I can cover the cost. If it is the fuel pump, I'd like to have the diagnostic fee waived and repairs completed.

#[redacted]), without explaining or correcting the underlying cause. On [redacted], at approximately 1,181 miles, the engine stalled completely after a jolt shifting from reverse to drive. On [redacted], it nearly stalled at 25-30 mph near [[redacted]] and [[redacted]] with our granddaughter aboard. On [redacted], it nearly stalled at approximately 45 mph on [[redacted]]. On [redacted], at approximately 60 mph, it hesitated sharply and jolted, feeling as if it might stall. Also on [redacted], in approximately five miles of stop-and-go traffic moving 5-10 mph, it repeatedly bucked, jerked, surged, and failed to accelerate normally, bringing us dangerously close to vehicles ahead. Forceful jolts pushed us hard against our seats. The Jeep was at Douglas Jeep [redacted] . The symptoms persisted after repair. On [redacted], its service order recorded "chug and buck," with no correction available. On [redacted], the service director attributed the behavior to "atypical throttle engagement," although incidents continue. The SOS/ASSIST system also repeatedly fails to connect; on [redacted] it displayed "Feature not active," and the sheriff's department contacted us about 15 minutes later. These frequent failures could leave us unable to summon help after a crash or breakdown. We request NHTSA investigate possible engine/powertrain defects, repeated plug fouling, stalling/loss of propulsion, and emergency-call failures. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)