Latest vehicle complaints

pedal was depressed; however, the vehicle failed to accelerate as intended. The vehicle lost motive power and the engine seized. The vehicle was towed to the dealer. The contact was informed that the parts were unavailable to repair the vehicle. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V467000 (Fuel System, Gasoline); however, the part to do the recall repair was unavailable. The failure mileage was 100,000.

detached suspension connection and the recovered fastener. We are concerned that this failure may involve a safety-related defect in the front suspension mounting hardware. We request that NHTSA investigate whether this incident is related to recall 21V-835 / Tesla campaign SB-21-31-003, or any other suspension defect or recall affecting this vehicle. Please review this incident for potential safety implications for other vehicles and determine whether further investigation is warranted. We can provide photographs, the failed hardware, repair records, and additional details about the circumstances of the incident. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

with the part provided by the manufacturer. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and initially informed the contact that a case was pending authorization for a loaner vehicle, tow truck service, and repair assistance; however, the dealer later informed the contact that the manufacturer had only agreed to cover the repair. The failure mileage was 117,627.

approximately two and a half months ago. The Expedition came down onto his surgically repaired leg, potentially causing additional injury. Even more concerning, the Ford-provided jack slipped three times during this incident. The first occurrence happened when my husband was attempting to remove the tire. As the tire came off the jack slipped and caught his leg underneath the vehicle. He caught it and tried to put the jack back in place to get his leg out, but it slipped again. On the third attempt, he was finally able to remove his right leg, which had been pinned underneath the whole time. Note: He followed the instructions and placed the jack where specified. We have video evidence showing the positioning of a tire underneath the Expedition. That tire appears to have prevented the full weight of the vehicle from coming down on his leg. Without that protection, this incident could have resulted in catastrophic injury or death. We have discovered that there are multiple safety recalls involving the 2024 Expedition, although we have not confirmed an existing recall specifically involving the original factory jack. Given the seriousness of this incident, we formally request: An immediate investigation of the factory-supplied jack and its potential failure. Identification of the original jack's manufacturer, supplier, part number, design specifications, and rated capacity. Review of previous consumer complaints, warr INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

acceleration problems. This was very unsafe because either myself or other couldve been injured. I called jeep and they told me to drive it in to the Dodge dealership in Andrews TX, I want to emphasizes this is very unsafe, because it wont accelerate as it should. I have to drive down a road that oil tanker semis drive on as well.

Nissan-related technical or programming issues prevented completion and return of my vehicle. The dealership-versus-body-shop issue Nissan Consumer Affairs told me that rental assistance might have been considered if my vehicle had been sitting at a Nissan dealership. That reasoning does not address the reality of my situation. Nissan dealerships in Memphis do not perform the collision body repairs my Pathfinder required. Had I taken my wrecked vehicle to a Nissan dealership, I would have been directed to a collision repair facility. Pre-accident concerns: fluid leak, brakes, and AEB Before the collision on [[redacted]], I had already noticed a spot from fluid leaking underneath my Pathfinder in my garage. I sent photographs and discussed the condition with Brock Carroll, the finance manager. He told me to bring the vehicle in to be looked at. I also told him that the brakes did not feel right. The Pathfinder had only approximately 800 miles on it. I was on my way to Nissan to have those concerns checked when the collision occurred. Immediately before impact, I remember the vehicle stopping, releasing, and stopping. I also noticed that my vehicle wasn't driving right anymore. Taking off and power was and is still have a slow take-up. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

deploying in a crash, risking serious injury or death. I have now been without my vehicle for over three weeks while trying to resolve this. I haven't been able to work or leave my apartment for the entire three weeks. The Williamsport dealership cannot perform the repair because Tampa refuses to correct the false completion record or pay for the repair. The Tampa location has been proved photo proof of the recall not being completed. During a three way call with both dealerships and my Jeep case manager, Tampa continued refusing to resolve the issue and reportedly instructed Vancampen Motors Inc - Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge, Ram to misclassify as a repair of a defective recall instead. The tampa dealership was paid out for this recall they did not complete in 2024. This obstruction is preventing a critical safety recall from being completed. I am requesting an investigation into the false recall record, the unperformed repair, and Tampa's continued refusal to allow the safety issue to be corrected.

inflator needs replaced. I opened case [[redacted]] with Subaru Customer Advocacy. Across two emails, their representative Tyler gave two different completion dates: [[redacted]], then [[redacted]]. He later admitted the first date was only the recall's effective date. Subaru's public website still displays [[redacted]]. I have asked twice, in writing, for the part number of the inflator that was installed and whether it was an interim Takata unit or the final non-Takata remedy. Subaru has not answered. A safety-critical airbag inflator throwing a failure code after a recall repair is not something I can accept as closed. I'm filing this complaint because Subaru's own records cannot agree on when or how the remedy was performed on this vehicle, and because the information the public relies on to judge airbag safety is wrong. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

control and adjusted the flap. I was told if it came on again it would need to be replaced. The light came on again and I took the vehicle in to have it replaced. It has not yet been repaired. The engine light comes on and even goes out while driving.Generally the light will come on and stay on for a few days and go off but it happens and I have not had one vehicle for more than a few months. I believe another problem is being generated from this because now I am having problems with the vehicle jerking because the vale has not been replaced.

at highway speeds on 3 occasions. Most recently ([[redacted]]), both passenger-side wheels detached in rapid succession on the highway, creating an immediate, life-threatening projectile risk to surrounding traffic. Attending State Highway Patrol kept us roadside 10+ hours and warned it was sheer luck no major crash or fatalities occurred and highly recommended reporting to NHTSA. **Confirmed by Dealer/Service Center?** Yes. **Aces Auto & Trailers (Cortez, CO)** confirmed 1 1/8" frame variance and weld cracks forcing the rear axle to "walk" out of alignment, generating extreme lateral shear that snaps lug studs. They declared the frame a total structural loss. **Beautiful AZ RV Repair (Jayco Authorized)** confirmed a bent axle spindle, ungreased bearings, and flattened leaf springs. **King's Diesel (LA)** confirmed complete lug shear. **Inspected by Manufacturer, Police, or Others?** Yes. **Lippert Components** inspected [[redacted]] (WO #[[redacted]]), recording frame misalignment, cracked welds, and body separation. **State Highway Patrol** managed the highway scene and advised filing with NHTSA. **Symptom progression:** July 2025: Severe, abnormal inside-edge tire wear exposing steel belts on factory-installed wheels/tires. May 2026: Rear passenger-side wheel sheared completely off at highway speeds without prior warning. [[redacted]]: Sudden, simultaneous detachment of both passenger-side wheels on the highway within 200 miles of leaving a repair facility. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

but the vehicle has not yet been inspected or repaired by the manufacturer or any independent shop. While currently only a noise (NVH) issue, progressive wear of this ball joint can lead to play in the suspension, uneven tire wear, degraded steering feel, and potential loss of control if the joint fails.

authorized dealership (Hiley Volkswagen) for a formal repair attempt, where an MIB3 recovery and software update were performed, but the safety defect persists. Volkswagen of America is aware of this ongoing safety hazard under Corporate Case Number 07809683. The unpredictable shutdown of the central screen and backup camera presents an imminent risk of backing into obstacles or pedestrians, violating federal safety regulations for rear visibility.