Ford Explorer Electrical problems by year

been called and still will not fix the issue which has progressed to affecting other parts of the vehicle unless we pay out of pocket with quotes over $2,000!! There is a recall and it's close to 2yrs waiting for the "part" but now the part has actually fallen off it's causing more electrical and costly issues. Ford needs to pay for these repairs now with no more excuses. I need help please.

vehicles in front or behind us. The vehicle began to jerk forward and stop hard, if we proceeded, which we could do, limping the SUV, on back streets, only 1/2 mile from dealership. Once at dealership at Ford in Seaside, California, they ran diagnostics, and re-calibrated the faulty module(s), that may have caused this. Fast forward to [redacted], while at stop sign in [[redacted]], we proceeded at slow speed, maybe 10mph or so, and SUV abruptly braked on us and came to complete stop, with warning on instrument display. We pulled over, shutoff vehicle for a minute or so, turned back on and were able to drive again normally. We took a chance, and a few days later, drove vehicle up to the dealership (The Ford Store, Morgan Hill, California) to diagnose. They had it for a few days, and determined the Electronic Brake Booster module needed replaced and whatever they did additionally, like re-calibrations, etc. We're crossing our fingers we don't encounter problem(s). SUV is under warrantly, still, and we did purchase an extended warranty when we purchased it, new, back in XX . We're just praying this doesn't happen if we're driving at a high speed. Never had problems with our three previous Ford Explorers. Of course, these 2025s and newer ones have extensive electronics. Needless to say, my wife is scared this issue might happen again. We can't be the only Ford Explorer or Ford vehicle that might have encountered these issues? INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

kept my car for one full week. I was told the problem could not be duplicated and the car was returned to me with no repairs. Prior to this occurring there had been no warning lights on the dash board or otherwise. I find this unacceptable as this incident could have ended catastrophically and can happen again at any time.

issues. it's not safe and it's messing up my transmission and my car keeps stopping and starting in the middle of traffic. I have a family I LOVE my vehicle but it's not safe and I can't afford to fix it.

"Reverse Brake Assist Not Available - See Manual." These problems raise serious safety concerns because the vehicle's camera visibility is compromised while another safety system reports that it is unavailable. This creates potential risks when backing near children, pedestrians, other vehicles, or obstacles. I have photographs documenting the camera malfunctions and dashboard warning. Ford subsequently issued Recall 25S27 after discovering that certain vehicles previously repaired under Recall 23S23 may not have received the correct remedy, even though the repairs were recorded as completed. I have not yet received confirmation whether Recall 25S27 applies to my specific vehicle. On October 8, 2026, I visited Mullinax Ford of Olympia regarding the recurring safety problems. The dealership advised that I would have to pay out of pocket for a diagnosis. I subsequently submitted a written request asking for the recurring defect and applicable recall coverage to be reviewed, but received no response. I escalated the matter to the dealership's General Manager on October 19, 2026. The underlying cause has not been determined. I am concerned that the original camera safety defect may not have been adequately corrected and that the vehicle continues to experience a related safety risk. I request that NHTSA review these recurring malfunctions and the adequacy of the previous recall remedy.

later sought additional diagnosis. The vehicle continued to experience drivability/electrical problems, including misfire symptoms and eventually a no-start condition. After further testing, another authorized Ford dealership diagnosed the PCM as faulty. I contacted Ford Motor Company because I am concerned that the recall service, programming, or work performed during the recall may have contributed to the PCM failure. Ford closed my case because the recall was marked completed and stated that my vehicle is outside its warranty period. I returned the vehicle two days after servicing dealership as the recall repair to report problems. I am requesting that this be reviewed as a possible recall-repair-related safety issue. The PCM failure and associated engine/electrical problems could affect drivability and the vehicle's ability to operate safely. The vehicle and related repair records are available for inspection.

to replace the entire headlamp assembly at an over a $3500 cost. The problem is Ford does not know that this will correct the issue. If it truly was a headlamp issue wouldn't our headlamps go out completely after approximately a year of experiencing the headlights going out intermittingly, especially when they are supposed to last the life of the vehicle. The dealership printed out the detailed list of codes on our vehicle going back to January and it confirms the headlights intermittently going out. Besides the dealership, we have spoken to Ford corporate multiple times and they are unwilling to help us in any way nor do they want to address this dangerous issue. An investigation needs to be opened into this matter before a serious accident occurs and Ford needs to answer why this issue is happening to so many vehicle owners and create a recall. NHTSA has helped me before with a problem/recall I had on my Dodge Durango many years ago and I am hopeful that we will be helped on this issue as well.

detached while I was driving and was flapping against the vehicle. There was a risk that the part could have completely separated from the vehicle and struck another vehicle, pedestrian, or object in the roadway. I was also distracted while attempting to manage the situation and find a safe place to stop. Operating a vehicle with components coming apart created an unsafe condition for me and other motorists. 3. Has the problem been reproduced or confirmed by a dealer or independent service center? Yes. A Ford dealership observed the detached trim and temporarily secured it with tape. The trim was later repaired; however, the same component has detached again, demonstrating that the problem has recurred. 4. Has the vehicle or component been inspected by the manufacturer, police, insurance representatives, or others? The component was inspected by a Ford dealership, which temporarily secured the trim and later repaired it. The vehicle has not been inspected by police or insurance representatives, to my knowledge. 5. Were there any warning lamps, messages, or other symptoms of the problem prior to the failure, and when did they first appear? There were no warning lamps or messages before the B-pillar trim detached. After the trim became loose and was temporarily secured, the vehicle began exhibiting additional symptoms, including a malfunctioning security system, inability to open the tailgate, and failure to shut off completely.

degraded processing in the Accessory Protocol Interface Module (APIM). Navigation display systems lag behind the actual vehicle location by approximately 0.1 miles, causing delayed routing information and significant driver distraction. System resets (soft reboots and full master resets) fail to fix the issues. Upon contacting Ford In-Vehicle Technology support, representatives acknowledged the issue but refused to log or escalate the side-mirror failure as a safety defect.